« December 2007 | Main | October 2007 »
Thursday, November 22, 2007
history weeps
Have you ever wondered why Canada has legislated the largest damage payout in history? The residential school settlement payments total more money than any lawsuit in history. Do you wonder why? Do you think it's enough, too much, too little? Watch this 2 hour documentary UNREPENTANT: KEVIN ANNETT AND CANADA'S GENOCIDE Now think again. Is it enough?
Wednesday, November 14, 2007
Yellowknee DO status?
It astounds me to read that they're considering Dangerous Offender
status for Raymond Yellowknee. He's been convicted of no more than
three instances of drunk driving. The latest ended in a terrible
tragedy of a mother and her daughters wiped off the face of the earth.
An onerous crime certainly. Definitely worthy of punishment to the
fullest extent of the law. The man should certainly spend a decade at
minimum in jail, perhaps longer. But life imprisonment with no hope of
bail is unreasonable. We're talking about an alcoholic with a wounded
spirit. This is not a killer or a predator. I see images of him and I
can see it written in his face. This is a man in severe need of
healing, not containment. His is the face of a man who could be much
more. I can see that he has a deep soul. He's just an alcoholic of the
most extreme sort and when he's drunk the devil takes him. If he could
be sobered up and kept sober he would have as much to offer his world as
any other, perhaps more. Why then can't we, a great society with so
many advancements in the 21st century, offer him the services he needs
to achieve this healing? If he was white, would we? He needs alcohol
abuse treatment and psychological counselling, intensely. I'm married
to a man who was guilty of the same crimes twice as often but being a
good old white boy, he kept getting his wrist slapped instead. Granted,
he was lucky enough not to take any victims in his wild careens through
town, and fortunate enough not to have to steal a car to do it, but
otherwise, what difference is there? How many people do you know who
have driven when they were clearly too drunk to pilot a car safely?
Should they be designated dangerous offenders?
Yellowknee is just a sick man in need of deep healing. He's not a
deadly psychopathic predator and that is what the designation is
intended to address!
We as yet do not know how to cope with or cure pedophilia, serial rape,
and serial murder. The only way to cope with them currently is permanent
restraint or execution. This is not true of alcoholism. Many people
have recovered from this disease and gone on to be good sober people.
It's not enough to dry out, of course, they need to address a lot of
psychology. The things that drove them to drink in the first place need
to be addressed and resolved. Still, it sounds like we're slamming the
door on Yellowknee without compassion or thought. It's not right and
the question should never have been considered in the first place. Get
that man some first class treatment you cheap bastards!
Good luck Raymond. May the great spirit reach you and fill you with
purpose and hope.
Saturday, November 10, 2007
able bodied worker turned down
There are employers claiming to be desperate for employees. Help wanted
signs sprout like weeds. It's believed that no able bodied worker
should be unemployed. Hrm. Sure. So why did Enterprise never get back
to me when I so keenly wanted a job few would do? They need part time
employees to clean out the rental cars. Seemed like a perfect match for
me and I applied. I did all the bullshit required including applying
twice, both online through their nutty form, and locally with resume and
drivers abstract. Resume for a fucking car washing job!!!! Now that's
ridiculous. But it sounded good and promising. I even was referred by
a current employee.
However, I'm tainted by a bad job history. Yes, I've never been fully
employed for any decent length of time in my life. Reasons don't
matter, they don't care. They see that and won't touch me with a ten
foot pole. So if it wasn't for my husband I'd still be an able bodied
person on welfare.
Don't be so quick to make your assumptions. Not when condemning the
unemployed, not when choosing whom to hire. I would have been a very
useful employee had they given me a chance. I might yet if I can ever
get ahold of anyone there and talk them around. I don't know if I have
the confidence to try though. I keep telling myself to try, then I
answer that I don't want to hear the response. Right now I can make up
excuses why they never called me. If they tell me to my face that I
look like a loser and a bad risk, it'll break my heart. To think I'm
not considered good enough even for a stupid grunt job like that. It's
terrible. I've put a lot of work into feeling good about myself,
feeling respectable and included in the world. Something like this can
topple that house of cards too easily. It's why I gave up job hunting
in the first place. It just depresses me. It's worse being a rejected unemployed bum than being a lazy unemployed bum.
Tuesday, November 06, 2007
flying parrots
Sam is getting more comfortable locomoting himself around the place. He's got some strange attraction for Freddy's area. I really don't know what that's about. He heads there first thing in the morning and back again most times of the day. He stays there almost all the time. Getting him back to his cage has been problematic with having to spook him off there and then he flaps and crashes near his cage. Lately he's been successfully flying to his stand by the cage instead of crashing around. Still, he needs extreme urging to go. I got him to fly with encouragement a couple times but mostly it took spooking with something. This morning around the time I was going to bring round the morning freshies he actually flew over there by his own volition, neat and swift with a minimum of flapping. He's over in his cage chowing on the tasty things I brought. I also notice that these days when I come have a look everyone quits fighting and backs into their respective corners, keeping an eye on me. I like that. They don't fear me in the sense of not knowing what to expect, but in the sense of knowing when to expect something to expect, you know? It sure makes things easy when the critters mind. Sam is learning, as the others have, that things are fine if you're just doing nothing, and if you don't know you did something wrong, you'll be explained first. I always make sure a critter knows it before I start enforcing. I mean, if he's never been on that shelf before how does he know he shouldn't be there till I tell him? And if I told him once, do I know for sure he understood? Sometimes they need to be reminded and taught a few times, especially if its a passionate situation like fighting with someone or a particularily fascinating obsession. So I don't just land on someone's head and when I do punish to enforce, I never use real violence. I yell, I might even bang things in the vicinity, but ultimately, being locked up for awhile is as bad as it gets. Sam's learning this pretty fast and it does build trust. An animal trusts when he can predict. He needs to know what to expect from you. No surprise mood swings, you know? Negativity always is caused by something that pet did, not by your boss on the phone, or another pet's misbehaviour. If you turn to a pet who's not misbehaving you always must lift your voice and smile and speak sweet. They need to know you're able to love them and control yourself. They need to know you're never negative with them unless they actually are doing something you have taught them not to do!
I don't hold with this current idea that you never punish, never use negative reinforcement. I figure nature uses it freely, other animals use it freely on each other. I figure it's part of animal psychology with most intelligent critters, so why not with me? Thing is, it has to be balanced with positive. More than that, positive has to outweigh it. The animal quits caring if he never gets praised and treated like a sacred creature. The more praise you can lavish the better. Then the reinforcement isn't doing the whole job, it's just speeding up the results and providing a little backup incentive. The praise has to be the primary focus, the primary incentive. It's jus that if you only praise it's also unbalanced and your critter can become a tyrant. Can start disrespecting you and pushing you because he doesn't care about what you think of him. Not everyone lives to please you!
self conciousness
Had trouble on a bird list because I took it too seriously when someone
criticized me. The problem is that there's 2 women with the same first
name. One is an experienced bird expert, the other a neophyte with less
experience than me. The latter was peck peck pecking at me.
Criticising me and implying that I was cruel and abusive and just plain
wrong in my methods with my birds. Another woman, equally new and
surprisingly inept with her own birds, also pecked at me. Then to top
it all off, a newbie came along barking at their heels like a chihahau
getting in the last word at a junkyard. I didn't quit the list, just
took a no mail break. Then tonight I decided to do a bit of archive
research and find out just how well things are going for these women
with their birds. They're so expert. Have they had a problem bird
before? Well, yes, actually, and neither has resolved the issues. I'm
into my 2nd problem bird and the issues are rapidly resolving. My
methods might be vulnerable to mis-use but they work when applied the
way I do.
I don't coddle my pets. I don't spoil them. Sam's problem, simply put,
is he's been spoiled by cowardly owners who let him take a tyrant's role
and rule the roost, to his detriment. Time and again his meek owners
have given up and passed him along till now he's the Lone Wolf, Mr.
Independant. He takes what he wants and if he can't get his demands
through fast enough he grinds into the nearest flesh. This is
unacceptable around here and he's running up against an implacable wall
in me. That's resulted in some fights. I've won those fights. It
wasn't without some flapping and shouting and angry words from both of
us. However, he's learning now that while I can get pissed, I don't get
dangerous. I am scary, but don't harm even when at my temper's end.
He's learning too that I don't fly from joy to rage without warning,
that my responses to him are always triggered by his actions, and that
he in fact has got some control over me. If he's sweet, I'm sweet.
Simple. If he's rude, I'm cold and if he's obnoxious, I'm firm. He
will go in his cage, even if it takes a fight with leather gloves,
towels, and determined pulling. In fact I've only had to do any
particular method of force once and he doesn't ask for a repeat. That
in turn makes it easier every time. Now when I tell him to go to his
cage I don't have to force him at all. That means we don't have scenes.
It's only been 6 wks and he no longer tries to sneak bite me whenever
the chance arises. I don't trust him enough to offer my flesh to his
beak, but I'm also not afraid to get up and hang out with him and give
him some time and attention.
Sam came here hating me and loving Dan. That wasn't going to work
because Dan is out working a lot of the day and Sam won't get much time
to see him. Not enough to satisfy the boy's needs socially and for
affection and attention. What's more, Dan isn't an experienced critter
person. He loves critters and is gentle and patient with them, and
forgiving, but he hasn't got the time or patience to learn training
techniques. Sam has to come round and treat me like a family member.
This is beginning to happen.
Now these women on this list say it's impossible or unlikely enough to
be unreasonable, that a bird with a preference and a dislike such as Sam
has can be brought round. I'm wasting my time trying to "make him like
me." He'll never like me if he dislikes me on principle. Each of them
has a bird who treats them or their spouse like crap. They accept that
as a permanent situation. I simply think they're wrong. I think first
off the bird has to learn that big animals need to be respected because
their big animals. I mean, sure, I won't bite him back, won't eat him
either, and I want him to feel secure with me, but not till he realizes
that aggravating big animals isn't in his best interest! First the
respect must be established! He's the little guy. He's the dependant.
He's the one with a behaviour problem. I show him plenty of
consideration and respect. I pay attention to his needs and wants and
when they are reasonable I always do my best to show him I'll go along
with it. I try and encourage him to explore, to communicate, to stretch
his boundaries and wings. I expect a certain respect in return. I do
this with all my critters. Rabbits, dogs, anyone who has the ability to
cause pain is expected to restrain himself with others. If I were
another parrot I'd return bite for bit and biggest or more assertive of
us would be the one in charge. Well I'm not a parrot, but I'm bigger
and damn well going to be more assertive. I'm the smarter one and the
one who has the resources and responsibility. I'm in charge. That
simple. I can't bite him back because it would be too dangerous to his
well being. Instead, I lock him up.
These women criticized that. They don't want me scolding him for
biting. They don't want me herding him back into his cage. Frankly I'm
not sure what they do want because they only seem to be focussing on
percieved danger.
You see, it's possible to misuse my concepts. It would be so easy for
one with less control and more ego to brutalize the little guy. You
have to apply a lot of compassion and empathy with these delicate
critters. You can draw a hard line. You can firmly toe it. You cannot
take it personally for more than a few seconds and cannot break certain
rules of engagement. You must never hold it against them long term and
let it change your efforts to inject love into their world. You must
never accelerate anything. Not the punishment, not the speed, not the
expectations. You can't resent them. You have to find more courage
every time they spook you. You have to accept every tiny little effort
on their part as though they moved a mountain for you, because they
usually did. You have to give them the benefit of the doubt whenever
there is any and must remember always that they're not as smart as you
wish they were. In fact, you assume they're not even as smart as they
look, because they probably aren't. Let them surprise you with their
genius instead.
You also need to be very aware of the animal's personality. Each
character has it's own needs. You can't play tough guy with a nervous
sensitive critter who's main crime is begging for too much love so that
they're obnoxious about it (always nosing in no matter what you're
doing, interfering with other animals, licking too much, etc.) You have
to be organic in your approach. A critter who's trying to be in charge
needs a different approach from one who's shrinking in terror in the
corner. There's alphas and betas, cowards and fools, strong and weak.
Everyone is different and you have to find out who you're dealing with.
I don't follow the rules on someone's website or in a book, I make my
own rules and follow them. I've done a heck of a lot of reading about
critters in my life. Studied them in university, absorbed
documentaries, magazines, books, websites, and gone into the field to
get to know any animals I ever had the chance to know. I've studied
many systems of training and tried them out. These days I make it up as
I go along, like a chef who's done so many recipes he no longer needs
them to create. I don't take it well when some newcomer on the scene
starts calling me out about my methods, parroting at me the various
websites she's recently read as though it's gospel.
I'll be getting snootfulls of spicey african feathers long before those
ladies ever get their problem birds to step up and none of my birds will
be bald and screaming all day. Sheesh. Telling me what to do like I'm
some kid still wet behind the ears and going back after me time and
again like they're rescuing my birds from hell.
I'm so mad I could just spit.
Now I will be thinking about my comeback to the list. Do I write a
return letter? If so, do I try and say some of what's up there? Do I
say I shouldn't have taken criticism so seriously and need to remember
that I've got years of experience, education, and even training in
animal psychology? Or do I just return and act like nothing happened?
I think they need to know though, that I'm not a raw neophyte. I think
they need to know I have university experience, field experience, and
have taken a course or two in animal training, as well as being an avid
student of animal psychology since I learned to read. I just don't know
how to bring it up. I did go overboard. With each criticism I tried
harder to describe the way I was coping with Sam, dealing with him, to
show them thereby that I wasn't doing wrong. Problem is, they just kept
reading only what they feared was there because of the one day I had a
shouting match with Sam and told the list about it. That was so
shocking to the more tender-hearted folks that they just couldn't let go
of it. For many people, shouting is synonymous with a loss of control
and precipitate to violence. In my past when I was young and got
violent, it was always preceded by utter silence. It's when I stop
shouting that you need to worry.
These days I haven't done anything in anger that I regretted later for a
very long time. I don't. I would sooner go downstairs and ram my head
repeatedly into a door till it clears than let myself act out of my
anger. Doesn't mean I don't get angry and express it though! Dammit,
anyway, you ever watch a parrot cuss someone out? They understand anger
and shouting perfectly well! Petey does this almost daily with me,
usually over something as trivial as wanting more junk food that I won't
give him, or wanting me to stop doing chores and settle down for a
longer cuddle fest with him. He screeches, literally flies into a rage
and attacks my head with claws and beak. Even so, he doesnt bite down
when he gets my flesh in his beak. He used to so I know he can, but he
pulls back at that point. Always. That's what I do, and that's what I
ask of Sam and expect he'll deliver eventually. For now I'll settle for
having him think twice before he reaches out to chomp.
Whew. I don't think there is an end to this rant but there's an end to
my day and it's already an hour past, so for now, I'll send this
unedited, unproofed, unabridged to the server.
Thursday, November 01, 2007
short term breakdown.
I'll be fine in a little while. It's not like anything really serious is
happening. I'm just getting tired enough from all the worries that I
can't help crying now. I wish there was someone here to talk to but
there isnt. First off, the problem isn't that large. Secondly, it's the
afternoon and most folks are working. Lastly, I don't really have any
friends that close that I can call them and they'd sit with me and pat
my hand and say "there there dear." I do have a computer though, and I
can write this blog post. That will give me the illusion that I'm being
heard and that'll get it off my chest.
I've spent the last two days
making phone calls all over the place, acting like a competent person,
urging people to do things. Firstly, our immigration lawyer informs me
that we've been turned down twice now for a work permit. We discuss it,
and conclude that getting letters of reference from former employers
might break them down finally. That's one problem I've been working on,
tracking down american companies Dan's worked for and urging the
supervisor he knew to fax us a letter of recommendation or such. Nothing
came in last night, nor this morning, so today I had to phone them all
again and leave messages reminding them. I also wrote a letter to some
MPs in hopes that one of them might be moved to do a little ass-kicking,
though there's no reason they should care about our problem more than
anyone else's.
Secondly, Dan's thrown out his back. He's in a lot of
pain. I spent an hour massaging it at 4am because the pain woke him up.
I woke up to pee and saw him suffering there. The massaging didn't do
much besides comfort him. So today I'm trying to get him treated by a
chiropractor. We waste a couple hours and forty bucks on one guy who
sends him for X-rays we can't afford. I waste more time phoning around
trying to find out how much they are (too much) and if the Dr. can work
without them. After a few hours waiting for him to get back to me I lose
patience and book someone else, making sure this time that they
understand that we simply cannot afford $250 xrays. Around here nobody
really understands the idea of someone not having medical insurance. It
confuses them when I tell them. They need me to explain in detail where
he's from and why being married to me isn't enough to get him coverage.
I am annoyed at having to do that because it's really none of their
business. It's enough that he hasn't got insurance! So sure enough right
after I've called the first office to cancel his follow-up appointment
the Dr. finally gets back to me. He's naturally not happy that we're
going elsewhere. I'm on the spot. Feeling awfully uncomfortable trying
to be polite and not tell him that I think his office isn't enough on
the ball and we aren't in a patient state of mind, while he's trying to
assure me he's doing the best for Dan, cares about his pain, etc. That
was what knocked me over. It was so hard to deal with. Basically I was
firing someone, you know? On flimsy grounds. I know I've been unfair but
of course I don't want to make the call to cancel the other doctor now
either. I just want my husband to get treated! Besides, the other clinic
has several practitioners and also offers massage and acupuncture.
What's more, I think it's the one Dan's coworker was recommending. It's
got the right name.
I'm using my cell phone for most of these calls,
the local ones, as well as calling dan repeatedly, and my minutes are
limited. People are putting me on hold. Why I'm doing that is because I
want to keep the home phone open to recieve faxes! Finally, and this is
just the last straw, we're out of money again and waiting for payments
again. Dan's working slower than ever with his back pain and the job he
did get completed this week isn't paying him. They were supposed to get
their asses in to the store and leave a cheque for him on Wednesday and
the fucking asshole salesman in charge of the job isn't doing anything
to assist, just saying the guy wasn't in. Not phoning to follow up. Not
concerned at all. meantime we're almost out of fresh food, dog food,
rabbit hay, and out of rabbit litter. We need to go grocery shopping and
pet food shopping and pay these chiropractor bills and keep Dan's truck
fuelled.
Oh, and of course the tension at home with the new parrot
still not harmonizing in the household isn't helping. I'm so tired. I
just want some good news. I just want to vent. Why do people not
understand the simple need to tell someone about your troubles? Why is
it such a burden to hear? I tell you, just listening to someone
complain, saying you hear them and you're sorry and you wish you could
do something and yes, it's tough some days. That's a gift. Give it to
someone today, ok? If we all do this for each other, we'll all be a bit
happier.
If I cant cheer up soon I'll have to tell Dan I watched a
sad movie. I don't want to add guilt over my tears to his burdens. His
poor back carries enough weight already.
Oh, my car is still at Ray's
for work. Looks like I won't see it before Sunday and we're going to
have to put Ray off for payment if we don't see some income soon.
